Contract document issues cost contractors their margins. VeriSpec automates the review of all your specs, drawings and procurement documents to catch scope gaps, risks and ambiguous specifications early. Protect your margins — book your demo to see how it's done.
Question: Specification §7.4 requires a double-interlock pre-action system supervised by VESDA detection. No corresponding interlock detail appears in the fire protection set (FA-501, FP-201). Please confirm the required configuration and issue the governing detail. Absent clarification, we reserve the right to a Change Order for added detection zones and releasing panels.
Figures from VeriSpec's internal pilot reviews, 2026.
Add automated document reviews to your workflow and expose the flaws and contradictions early. Between bidding for the project and the close-out phase, contractors' margins can be severely hit by low-quality IFC sets. Drive clarity, automate RFIs, and justify the changes with evidence-backed reports of ambiguity and contradiction.
Run the contract against the drawings and specifications. Every contradiction, ambiguity and scope gap gets caught, with the citation to back up the comment.
What would have taken your costing team days to review and coordinate, VeriSpec does in minutes. Use VeriSpec to focus where most needed.
Don't absorb the cost of document issues. Catch the ambiguity, automate the RFI notice, win the Change Order.
The quicker you catch the issues, the faster you move to resolving them — and winning the clients back.
Upload to the dashboard — our system reads everything: contract, specifications, drawings and procurement documents.
For every clause, VeriSpec locates the related evidence and checks for consistency. Consistent clauses pass; contradictions fail with an output notice.
You get a conformance report: green ticks for what's met, flags for what's missed, each linked to the spec clause and document location.
General AI models can understand contracts, but they are not good at cross-referencing them with drawings and specifications to highlight risks. VeriSpec has the mind of a contracts administrator and estimator, and reviews contract documents with specialized training.
A general model answers fluently in text where a drawing has what you need. VeriSpec outputs a report with a verified 'Pass' or 'Fail' based on specific evidence in the drawings, notes, details, etc., with a marked-up document linked to the ruling.
Each finding is confirmed or rejected by an engineer, with a reason, and each ruling feeds back into the context layer. The reviews your team does today make the next package's review better, something a public AI model cannot do.
The model underneath is replaceable — VeriSpec runs on several and benchmarks each against engineer rulings. The context, the standard of proof, and the rulings are what you're buying.
Every finding carries its verified quote and its location on the drawing. Explore three illustrative RFI drafts across fire protection, electrical, and mechanical scopes.
Question: Specification §7.4 requires a double-interlock pre-action system supervised by VESDA detection. No corresponding interlock detail appears in the fire protection set (FA-501, FP-201). Please confirm the required configuration and issue the governing detail. Absent clarification, we reserve the right to a Change Order for added detection zones and releasing panels.
Question: Specification §3.4 requires main switchboard MSB-01 to have a minimum short-circuit rating of 65 kA. The equipment schedule on E-601 lists 42 kA for the same switchboard. Please confirm the governing rating against the fault study and issue a coordinated schedule. Procurement remains on hold pending clarification; a revised assembly may affect the quoted price and delivery date.
Question: Specification §4.6 requires condensate drainage from ceiling-mounted cooling units CU-01 through CU-04. Drawings M-301 and M-302 identify the units but do not show drain routes, connection points, or whether condensate pumps are required. Please issue the coordinated routing and discharge details, including any pump requirements. Additional piping, pumps, and access provisions will require pricing once the scope is confirmed.
Every finding cites the spec clause and the drawing location — so review becomes verification.
We're onboarding a small group of general contractors and estimating teams. Tell us about your spec workflow and we'll set up a review on your own documents.
No spam. We'll only reach out about your demo.
Thanks — choose a slot below and the invite lands in your inbox.
Calendar not loading? Open the booking page in a new tab.